Tonight on I'm American, Bitch, David continues his staunch advocacy of the pro-abortion lobby.
To compliment my argument, please check out
http://harazquack.blogspot.com/2005/07/pro-abortion-lobby.html
Let me begin by saying that I love my country, in this case, America. More than I love ponies, breathing, sex, reason, logic, and the new internet payment system "paypal."
Many people have questioned the abortion belief of the new Supreme Court nominees. What I can assure you is that the Court is in danger of continuing to have ZERO pro-abortion justices. Some are pro-choice, others pro-life, but ALL advocate continuing the existence of the human race!
The closest the pro-abortion lobby has come to having a Supreme Court Justice was Robert Bork, nominated by Reagan. If William Bennett ever wants to get into law and out of gambling, he has a home in the pro-abortion lobby.
The only problem with William Bennett is his racism. I mean, we are back-shit crazy, but we're not racist! We don't stand for that! We don't want to simply suggest (already language too weak for us) that aborting all black babies would lower crime (abort all fetuses, see what happens to crime!), we want to abort all fetuses. It is society that is fucked up, not any particular race, and thus all fetuses should be aborted, in order to eradicate society.
But race is not the pro-abortion's primary concern. In fact, it is not a concern at all. If all fetuses are aborted, then there won't be races! See, it makes sense.
Plus, we have a problem with Mr. Bennett's use of the term "aborting babies." We want to abort fetuses first and foremost. We promise to only abort babies if they slip through the cracks and are not aborted when they are fetuses. Aborting babies willy-nilly is for Hitler and Robert Bork, not the sane and rational pro-abortion lobby.
Speaking of insane and irrational, what is it with women wanting control over their own bodies? We do support not putting women on the Supreme Court, because they might insTITute some "dirty legal tricks" such as claiming precedent to save choice, or enacting some kind of privacy argument to curtail the pro-abortion lobby. That is the one area that the pro-abortion lobby and the pro-life lobby (or as I call them, the anti-death lobby [except for the death penalty and wars, hypocrites]) can agree upon. Women don't deserve "rights".
So to sum up:
Robert Bork:
Good- pro-abortion and hates women.
Bad- didn't make the Supreme Court to further the cause.
William Bennett:
Good- likes aborting things, people.
Bad- a bit too racist, into gambling instead of law.
pro-lifers:
Good- hate women, like some kinds of death.
Bad- hate abortion, even when done irresponsibly.
pro-choicers:
Good- occasionally dabble in abortion.
Bad- the true enemy, give abortion a bad name, respect women.
God Bless America and support your pro-abortion Supreme Court nominees!
No comments:
Post a Comment