I still can't believe that Bill Clinton has received no flack for his infidelity and his lies about something so dangerous. Bill Clinton got his knob cleaned by a woman who was not his wife and that is clearly a threat to national security.
Meanwhile, George Bush has been on the wrong side of a ton of criticism for no reason. We don't even know if Bush lied about the reasons to go to war. All we know is that the reasons he gave turned out to be wrong and that it is documented that his administration wanted to go to war against Iraq regardless of facts. We know that Bill Clinton did lie. Listen, I've lied about both and lying about the blowjob got me in way more trouble with my lady friend than did lying about justifications for war. But maybe that's just me.
The Bush-led government records our communications with one another. So did the fat woman that Monica Lewinsky told about licking Clinton's banana. And it's illegal to record a phone conversation in Maryland without telling the other person. The fat woman lived in Maryland. I live in Maryland. Bill Clinton was fat when he first came into office. That's strike two Clinton.
Bush was the leader of the government when it failed on September 11, 2001 and during the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. But Clinton was involved in an "explosion" on a dress and Ms. Lewinsky, a Jew, was drowned in Clinton's ....................... (gross). So Clinton is at least as equally responsible for this nation's tragedies.
Bush may have cut taxes only for the wealthiest Americans, but Clinton got rid of welfare, equally as damaging to poor people trying to turn their lives around. Wait a minute, scratch that last part. I meant to say, Clinton got his wood peckered and lied about it: disgusting, disrespectful, and distasteful.
Sure Bill Clinton was impeached, but so was Andrew Johnson; there’s precedent so it's not a big deal. George Bush has had his face caricatured on protestors' posters with words "No blood for oil," underneath. I know, I couldn't believe it either when I saw it. George Bush has feelings too you know.
Plus, Clinton and Bush both bombed Iraq and Afghanistan. And I think we can all agree that killing people is wrong, thus the Republicans were right: Clinton was a horrible person.
7 comments:
Woaw, what a magnificant piece of writing.Can I copy it and dispatch it in belgian blogs? You know, here in Europe we sometimes look with open eyes and growing unbelief at what happens in The States. Most of us, Belgians, can't imagine how your president can survive his presidentship. His acts as a leader are sometimes really unbelievable. On the other hand: private affairs are private in my country ( our minister of internal affairs started an affair with a journalist and kicked his wife out, another male minister had an affair with a toy-boy.., etc, etc..)
What counts is their leadership, their intelligence, sense of political responsability. But please, guys, if Bill is in need of a relaxing blowjob, than let him get one. It is none of our business.
Thanks, sure you can.
Exactly. Clinton was not a good president, but not because of his private affairs. Both Republicans and Democrats in this country need to wake up and realize that there have been more similarities between Clinton's and Bush's policies than differences.
Wow, while reading this, I tried to look for signs of sarcasm, but none came, I then tried to look for factual evidence that would support such claims, of which I was unable to find.
You see, regardless of what Bill Clinton did privately, his presidency, A presidency, is not based up on that, it's based up the procedures he sets forth for this country; In other words, his legacy. That’s WHY Lincoln is remembered for freeing slaves, not the numerous affairs he had with women. And, George Washington is remembered for our freedom, not the fact that he had slaves on the side to do his dirty work. As I’m sure by know you have come to the conclusion that Clinton was not the first and surely not the last to take advantage of his position in or out of the White-house. So, what makes George W. Bush different? Well, he too, took advantage of his position in the White-house to not only undermine the intelligence of this nation but to forgo the lives of thousands of innocent people in order to accomplish his preconceived master plan. Now, we are sure that Saddam Hussein, did not in-fact have WMD’s. Well, you may respond by saying that we assumed he did at that time. Well, in actuality, the briefings from the CIA, handed down to none other then Colin Powell was described as “sketchy at best.”
In all fairness, Bush needs to answer for his is actions; his low ratings indicate that the nation feels likewise. However, what’s done is done, and so we must force ourselves, to finish what we foolishly started. And, I sincerely hope that in no way are you referring to the equality of the dress to that of a human life.
Um, you didn't find any sarcasm? I certainly was comparing the loss of human life to mess on a dress. That's ridiculous isn't it? Sarcasm.
And what about my non-sarcastic comment above yours? That wasn't clear enough?
Anyway, I appreciate your thoughtful response. Sorry to make you look silly.
Yep. If anything, you guys should erect a statue of Bush. The size of the Statue of Liberty. He deserves it. (sarcasm)
He already has a monument named after him- the Washington Momument- cuz it looks like a big dick!
Sorry about the Oilers.
Here in Belgium every time Bush is on television he becomes more and more popular: the Bushisms we call the stupidities of this guy are the talk of the town. Fortunately, the future will bring us the most intelligent Arnold Swarzenegger, haha!
Post a Comment